Step-by-Step Guide
5 Steps
How to Respond to a Trademark Objection in India
Complete guide on how to respond to a trademark objection in India. Covers understanding the examination report, grounds of objection under Sections 9 and 11, drafting the reply, filing online, preparing for hearing, and overcoming common refusals. Step by step process updated for 2026.
Quick Overview
Estimated Cost
₹5000
Time Required
15 to 30 Days
Total Steps
5 Steps
What You'll Need
Documents Required
- Copy of the Trademark Examination Report received from the Trade Marks Registry
- Original trademark application details including application number, class, and filing date
- Evidence of prior use of the trademark (invoices, purchase orders, packaging, advertisements)
- Affidavit of use establishing the date of first use and continuous use of the trademark
- Sales figures, turnover data, and advertising expenditure related to the trademark
- List of geographic regions where the trademark is used or sold
- Copies of trademark registrations in other countries (if applicable, to show international reputation)
- Third-party dictionary definitions, articles, or references supporting the distinctiveness of the mark
- Letters of consent or coexistence agreements from cited prior mark owners (if applicable)
- Power of Attorney authorizing the trademark agent or attorney to file the reply
Tools & Prerequisites
- Active account on the IP India online portal (ipindia.gov.in) for checking status and filing
- Trademark agent or attorney experienced in trademark prosecution for drafting the reply
- Access to the IP India CGPDTM Journal archives for examining cited prior marks
- Online payment facility for paying any additional fees if required
- Access to legal databases for citing relevant case law in the reply
Filing a trademark application is just the first step in securing your brand's legal protection. After submission, the Trade Marks Registry assigns your application to an Examiner who reviews it against the provisions of the Trade Marks Act 1999. If the Examiner finds any grounds for refusal, they issue an Examination Report detailing the objections. Receiving an objection does not mean your trademark cannot be registered. It simply means you need to address the Examiner's concerns with a well-crafted reply supported by evidence and legal arguments.
This guide walks you through the entire process of responding to a trademark objection in India, from understanding the Examination Report to drafting the reply, filing it on the IP India portal, attending the hearing if required, and navigating the outcome.
Understanding the Trademark Examination Process
When you file a trademark application in India, it goes through a series of stages before registration. Understanding this process helps you appreciate why objections are raised and how to address them effectively.
Timeline of Trademark Application Processing
| Stage | Timeline | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Application Filing | Day 1 | Application filed online or physically with the Trade Marks Registry |
| Allotment to Examiner | 1 to 15 days | Application assigned to an Examiner at the Registry |
| Examination | 30 to 60 days | Examiner reviews the application under the Trade Marks Act |
| Examination Report | 30 to 60 days | If objections found, Examination Report is issued to applicant |
| Reply Filing | 30 days from report | Applicant must file reply addressing all objections |
| Hearing (if required) | 1 to 3 months after reply | Show Cause Hearing if Examiner is not fully satisfied |
| Acceptance and Publication | After reply/hearing | If accepted, mark is published in Trade Marks Journal |
| Opposition Period | 4 months from publication | Third parties can file opposition during this window |
| Registration | After opposition period | If no opposition, Registration Certificate issued |
Decoding the Examination Report
The Examination Report is the most important document in the objection process. Here is how to read and understand it.
Structure of the Examination Report
- Application details: Your trademark application number, mark, class, filing date, and applicant name
- Examiner's observations: A statement of the grounds on which the Examiner has raised objections
- Sections cited: The specific sections of the Trade Marks Act under which objections are raised (Section 9, Section 11, or both)
- Details of cited marks: For Section 11 objections, the report lists the prior marks that are cited as conflicting, with their application or registration numbers, proprietor names, class, and goods or services covered
- Deadline for reply: The report specifies the deadline for filing the reply (30 days from the date of the report)
It is common for the Examination Report to cite both Section 9 and Section 11 objections simultaneously. For example, the Examiner may say the mark is descriptive (Section 9) AND similar to a prior mark (Section 11). In such cases, your reply must address every objection separately with distinct arguments and evidence for each ground. Failing to address even one ground can result in the application being refused on that basis alone.
Types of Objections and How to Overcome Them
Objection 1: Lack of Distinctiveness (Section 9(1)(a))
This is the most common absolute ground objection. The Examiner may argue that your mark is descriptive of the goods or services, or that it is a common word that other traders should be free to use.
How to overcome:
- Argue that the mark is suggestive rather than descriptive. A suggestive mark requires a mental leap to connect the mark with the goods, making it inherently distinctive
- Show that the mark is a coined, invented, or arbitrary term that does not directly describe the goods
- Provide evidence of acquired distinctiveness through use. Submit invoices, advertisements, sales data, and consumer recognition evidence showing the mark has become identified with your business
- Cite analogous registrations where similar marks have been accepted for comparable goods
- Provide dictionary evidence showing the mark does not have a direct meaning in relation to the goods or services
Objection 2: Similarity to a Prior Mark (Section 11(1))
This is the most common relative ground objection. The Examiner has identified an earlier trademark (registered or pending) that they consider to be similar to your mark, covering the same or similar goods.
How to overcome:
- Compare the marks as a whole: Apply the anti-dissection rule and show that when compared in their entirety, the marks have different overall commercial impressions
- Highlight visual differences: Point out differences in spelling, length, font, design elements, and overall appearance
- Highlight phonetic differences: Demonstrate that the marks sound different when spoken aloud, with different syllables, emphasis, and pronunciation
- Highlight conceptual differences: Show that the marks convey different meanings, ideas, or associations in the consumer's mind
- Distinguish the goods or services: If the goods or services are different in nature, purpose, or trade channels, argue that there is no likelihood of confusion
- Check if the cited mark is still active: Search the IP India database to verify whether the cited mark is currently registered and in use. If it has been cancelled, abandoned, or is not in use for over 5 years, raise this as a strong argument
- File a cancellation against the cited mark: If the cited mark has not been used for over 5 years, file a cancellation petition under Section 47
- Obtain a Letter of Consent: If possible, obtain a written consent or coexistence agreement from the owner of the cited prior mark
When comparing your mark with the cited prior mark, apply the Triple Identity Test used by Indian courts: is the mark identical or similar? Are the goods or services identical or similar? Is there a likelihood of confusion among the relevant public? If you can break even one of these three elements, the Section 11 objection should not stand. Focus on the weakest link in the Examiner's comparison and build your strongest arguments around it.
Objection 3: Deceptive or Misleading Mark (Section 9(2)(a))
The Examiner may argue that the mark is likely to deceive the public or cause confusion regarding the nature, quality, geographic origin, or other characteristics of the goods.
How to overcome:
- Explain the actual meaning and context of the mark in relation to your specific goods or services
- Show that the mark is not misleading when considered in the context of how it is actually used in the marketplace
- Provide evidence that consumers are not being deceived and understand what the mark represents
- Cite case law where similar deceptiveness objections were overcome
Objection 4: Geographic Name or Surname (Sections 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(b))
Marks that consist of a geographic name or a common surname may be objected to as lacking distinctiveness.
How to overcome:
- Argue that the geographic name does not describe the origin of your goods (for example, AMAZON for e-commerce has no geographic connection to the Amazon river)
- Show that the surname has acquired distinctiveness as a brand through extensive use and advertising
- Provide evidence of secondary meaning where consumers associate the name with your business rather than the geographic location or person
Drafting the Objection Reply
A well-drafted reply is the cornerstone of successfully overcoming trademark objections. Here is a recommended structure.
Recommended Reply Structure
- Title and Application Details: State the application number, mark, class, applicant name, and the Examination Report reference number
- Introduction: A brief paragraph acknowledging receipt of the Examination Report and stating your intention to reply to each objection
- About the Applicant: Briefly describe the applicant's business, history, reputation, and the significance of the trademark to the business
- About the Trademark: Explain the origin, meaning, and conceptual significance of the trademark. If it is a coined term, elaborate on how and why it was created
- Response to Each Objection: Address each objection point by point with detailed legal arguments, factual evidence, and case law citations
- Evidence of Use: If claiming distinctiveness through use, present the evidence in a structured manner with exhibit references
- Case Law Citations: List and briefly summarize the key court decisions and Registry precedents that support your arguments
- Analogous Registrations: List similar marks that have been accepted by the Registry for similar goods or services
- Conclusion and Prayer: Summarize the key arguments and request the Examiner to accept the application for advertisement in the Trade Marks Journal
Filing the Reply on the IP India Portal
Step by Step Online Filing Process
- Log into the IP India e-filing portal at ipindia.gov.in
- Navigate to Trademarks and select the appropriate option for filing a response to Examination Report
- Enter your trademark application number
- Upload the written reply as a PDF document (ensure it is clearly formatted and properly signed)
- Upload supporting documents including evidence of use, affidavit, and any other annexures
- If filing through an agent, upload the Power of Attorney
- No additional fee is required for filing the reply (the original application fee covers this)
- Submit the reply and download the acknowledgment receipt
The 30-day deadline for filing the reply is strictly enforced. If you miss the deadline without requesting an extension, the application will be treated as abandoned. Start working on the reply immediately after receiving the Examination Report. If you need more time, file a request for extension within the initial 30-day period. Extensions of up to 1 month are generally granted. Do not assume you will get an extension; file the request proactively and well before the original deadline.
Preparing for the Hearing
If the Examiner schedules a hearing, preparation is critical. Here is how to prepare effectively.
Before the Hearing
- Review the Examination Report and your written reply thoroughly to refresh yourself on all arguments
- Prepare a crisp oral presentation summarizing the key arguments in 10 to 15 minutes
- Organize additional evidence if you have gathered new information since filing the reply
- Identify potential questions the Examiner may ask and prepare responses for each
- Research the Examiner's previous decisions if possible to understand their examination approach
- Print or prepare digital copies of all documents, case law citations, and evidence for reference during the hearing
During the Hearing
- Be professional and respectful in your interactions with the Examiner
- Start with the strongest argument and address each objection systematically
- Do not rush; take your time to present each point clearly
- Listen carefully to the Examiner's questions and respond precisely
- If you do not have an answer to a specific question, it is better to ask for time to respond in writing rather than improvising an incorrect answer
- Submit any additional documents at the hearing if they support your case
Since 2020, the Trade Marks Registry has been conducting virtual hearings via video conferencing. If you are attending a virtual hearing, ensure your internet connection is stable, your audio and video work properly, share your screen to present documents if needed, and have all relevant files readily accessible on your computer. Virtual hearings follow the same format and procedures as in-person hearings.
Understanding Possible Outcomes
After your reply and hearing, the Examiner will issue one of the following outcomes.
| Outcome | What It Means | Next Steps |
|---|---|---|
| Accepted and Advertised | All objections overcome; mark published in Trade Marks Journal | Wait for 4-month opposition period to pass |
| Accepted with Conditions | Accepted subject to disclaimer, limitation, or other conditions | Accept conditions or negotiate modifications |
| Show Cause Hearing Scheduled | Examiner needs further clarification or arguments | Attend hearing with additional arguments and evidence |
| Refused | Objections not overcome; application refused with reasons | Appeal to High Court within 3 months or file fresh application |
What to Do If Your Application is Refused
A refusal is not the end of the road. You have several options.
Option 1: Appeal to the High Court
File an appeal before the High Court of the jurisdiction where the Trade Marks Registry office is located. The appeal must be filed within 3 months of the refusal order. In the appeal, you can present new arguments, additional evidence, and fresh case law. The High Court examines the Examiner's order and may overturn it if it finds the refusal unreasonable or contrary to law.
Option 2: File a Fresh Application
In some cases, it may be more practical to file a new trademark application with modifications that address the grounds of refusal. This could include adding a distinctive device element to a word mark, narrowing the specification of goods, filing in a different class, or modifying the mark itself. A new application will have a new filing date and goes through the examination process afresh.
Option 3: Use the Mark as Unregistered
Even without registration, you can continue using the trademark with the TM symbol (instead of the encircled R) and rely on common law rights and passing off for protection. However, this provides weaker protection than registration. You still build goodwill and reputation through continued use, which may support a future registration attempt.
Cost Breakdown for Trademark Objection Reply
| Item | Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Government fee for filing reply | No additional fee | Covered under original application fee |
| Professional fee (trademark agent/attorney) | 3,000 to 15,000 rupees | Varies by complexity and reputation of the agent |
| Hearing attendance (additional professional fee) | 3,000 to 10,000 rupees | If hearing is scheduled and agent attends |
| Amendment form (TM-16) if needed | 900 rupees per class (e-filing) | Only if amendments are required |
| Cancellation petition against cited mark | 3,000 rupees (e-filing) | Only if filing cancellation under Section 47 |
| High Court appeal (if refused) | 15,000 to 50,000 rupees | Court fees plus advocate fees |
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Filing a generic template reply: Each Examination Report is unique. Your reply must specifically address the exact objections raised, not use a one-size-fits-all template
- Missing the 30-day deadline: This is the single most common and most costly mistake. The application is abandoned if the reply is not filed on time
- Not providing evidence of use: If you claim the mark has acquired distinctiveness, you must back it up with concrete evidence. Bare assertions without supporting documents are not persuasive
- Ignoring cited prior marks: If a Section 11 objection cites a prior mark, research that mark thoroughly. Do not assume the Examiner's comparison is wrong without analyzing it
- Not citing case law: Legal precedents significantly strengthen your arguments. Omitting relevant case law weakens the reply
- Poor quality evidence: Undated invoices, blurry photographs, internal documents without third-party validation, and post-filing-date evidence are weak and may be dismissed
- Not attending the hearing: If a hearing is scheduled and you fail to attend, the application may be refused in your absence
Related Trademark Services and Guides
Trademark objection response is one part of the broader trademark registration and protection process. Explore these related services and guides.
- Start with the complete trademark registration process if you have not yet filed
- Already registered? Learn about trademark renewal to maintain your protection
- Need to respond to a third-party opposition? Explore our trademark objection service
- Protect your creative works alongside trademarks with copyright registration
- Secure your inventions through patent registration in India
- File your brand name as a trademark with our professional trademark registration service
Conclusion
Receiving a trademark objection is a normal part of the registration process and should not discourage you. A significant percentage of trademark applications in India receive Examination Reports, and many of them are successfully overcome through well-crafted replies and hearings. The key to success lies in understanding the specific grounds of objection, conducting thorough research on cited prior marks, drafting a structured and evidence-backed reply, filing within the 30-day deadline, and attending the hearing prepared with strong oral arguments.
If the objection is based on descriptiveness, focus on proving distinctiveness through use. If it is based on similarity to a prior mark, compare the marks as a whole and highlight the differences. If the cited prior mark is dormant, consider filing a cancellation petition. And if a Letter of Consent from the prior mark owner is obtainable, it can be a powerful tool for overcoming the objection.
If you have received a trademark objection and need expert assistance with drafting and filing the reply, our team of trademark specialists at IncorpX has extensive experience in successfully overcoming all types of trademark objections. We handle everything from drafting the reply to attending the hearing and filing appeals if necessary.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Trademark Examination Report?
A Trademark Examination Report is an official communication from the Trade Marks Registry in India that details the objections raised by the Examiner against a trademark application. After a trademark application is filed, it is assigned to an Examiner who reviews it for compliance with the Trade Marks Act 1999. If the Examiner finds grounds for refusal, they issue the Examination Report. The report specifies the exact sections of the Act under which the objections are raised, the reasons for each objection, and in case of prior mark conflicts, the details of the cited prior marks. The applicant must file a reply within 30 days of receiving the report.
What are the common grounds for trademark objection?
The most common grounds for trademark objection in India fall under two categories: Absolute Grounds under Section 9 include marks that are descriptive of the goods or services, marks that lack distinctiveness, marks that are customary in trade, deceptive marks that could mislead the public, marks containing matter likely to hurt religious sentiments, and marks that are obscene or scandalous. Relative Grounds under Section 11 include similarity to an earlier trademark (registered or pending) covering the same or similar goods or services, and likelihood of confusion among the public. Section 11 objections are the most common and require comparing the applicant's mark with cited prior marks.
How much time do I have to respond to a trademark objection?
You have 30 days from the date of the Examination Report to file your reply. If you need more time, you can request a one-month extension from the Registry. If no reply is filed within the initial 30 days and no extension is requested, the trademark application may be treated as abandoned. It is strongly recommended to start preparing your reply immediately upon receiving the Examination Report to ensure a thorough and well-supported response within the deadline. Some trademark agents confirm the examination report date and calculate the exact deadline to avoid any confusion.
What happens if I do not respond to the trademark objection?
If you do not file a reply to the Examination Report within the prescribed 30-day period (or the extended period if an extension was granted), the trademark application is treated as abandoned under Section 133 of the Trade Marks Rules 2017. An abandoned application cannot be revived. You would need to file a completely new trademark application, pay the application fee again, and go through the entire examination process from scratch. The new application will also receive a new filing date, which means you lose the priority of the original application date. This can be significant if other parties have filed similar marks in the interim period.
What is a Section 9 objection?
Section 9 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 lists the absolute grounds for refusal of trademark registration. The key provisions are: Section 9(1)(a) refuses marks that are devoid of distinctive character or consist exclusively of marks or indications that designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, or geographic origin of the goods or services. Section 9(1)(b) refuses marks that consist exclusively of marks or indications that have become customary in current trade or established practices. Section 9(2) refuses marks that are likely to deceive or cause confusion, contain scandalous or obscene matter, or are contrary to law or morality. Section 9(3) refuses marks that consist exclusively of shapes resulting from the nature of the goods, shapes necessary for technical results, or shapes that give substantial value to the goods.
What is a Section 11 objection?
Section 11 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 lists the relative grounds for refusal. Section 11(1) provides that a trademark shall not be registered if it is identical or similar to an earlier trademark and is being applied for in respect of identical or similar goods or services, and there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public. Section 11(2) extends protection to well-known trademarks even when the goods or services are not similar. Section 11(3) provides additional protection against marks that would take unfair advantage of the earlier mark or be detrimental to its distinctive character or repute. Section 11 objections require a detailed comparison of the marks and the goods or services.
How do I overcome a descriptiveness objection under Section 9?
To overcome a descriptiveness objection, you can argue: the mark is not purely descriptive but has a suggestive, arbitrary, or fanciful element that makes it distinctive. The mark has acquired distinctiveness through use (secondary meaning) by providing evidence of extensive and continuous use including invoices, advertisements, sales data, and consumer recognition. The mark is a coined or invented word that does not directly describe the goods. Submit dictionary evidence showing the word does not have a direct meaning related to the goods or services. Cite analogous registrations where similar marks have been registered for similar goods. Provide market survey evidence showing consumers associate the mark with your business, not with the goods themselves.
How do I overcome a similarity objection under Section 11?
To overcome a similarity objection, argue one or more of the following: the marks are not similar when compared as a whole by highlighting differences in appearance, sound, meaning, overall impression, and commercial context. The goods or services are different and not competing or complementary, so there is no likelihood of confusion. The marks can honestly and concurrently coexist in the marketplace without confusion (Section 12 argument). The cited prior mark is descriptive or weak and should not enjoy broad protection. The cited mark has been abandoned, cancelled, or is not in use. Obtain a letter of consent or coexistence agreement from the prior mark owner confirming they have no objection. Provide evidence of long concurrent use without any actual confusion in the market.
What is honest concurrent use under Section 12?
Section 12 of the Trade Marks Act 1999 provides a defense against Section 11 objections. It states that if honest concurrent use of two similar trademarks can be established, the Registrar may permit registration of the later mark. To claim honest concurrent use, you must show: you have used the trademark continuously and openly for a significant period, the use is honest (not adopted with the intention to copy or take advantage of the prior mark), there has been no actual confusion in the marketplace despite concurrent use, and both marks can coexist in the market without consumer confusion. Evidence to support this claim includes dated invoices, advertisements, trade show participation records, and a declaration that no instances of actual confusion have occurred.
What evidence should I provide with my objection reply?
Strong evidence significantly improves the chances of overcoming objections. Include: Affidavit of use (sworn statement detailing the history of use, date of first use, and continuous use of the trademark), sales invoices and purchase orders (showing the trademark in commercial use, preferably spanning several years), advertising material (print advertisements, digital campaigns, social media presence, trade publications), financial data (annual turnover, advertising expenditure, market share), packaging and labels showing the trademark, customer testimonials or survey data demonstrating brand recognition, international registrations of the same mark, media coverage and press mentions, and website traffic data and domain registration records showing the trademark.
What is the format for the trademark objection reply?
The reply should follow a structured format: Header with the application number, mark details, class, and applicant name. Introduction acknowledging receipt of the Examination Report and stating the intent to reply. Background section providing a brief history of the applicant and the trademark. Point-by-point response addressing each objection raised in the examination report with legal arguments and factual evidence. Evidence section listing and describing all annexed documents with exhibit numbers. Legal precedents section citing relevant Indian court judgments and Trademark Registry decisions supporting your arguments. Prayer requesting the Examiner to accept the application for advertisement in the Trade Marks Journal. The reply should be professional, well-organized, and avoid emotional language.
What is the role of case law in the objection reply?
Citing relevant case law is one of the most effective ways to strengthen your objection reply. Indian courts and the Trade Marks Registry have issued numerous decisions on trademark distinctiveness, similarity, and confusion that can be cited as precedents. Key cases frequently cited include: Cadila Healthcare vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals (anti-dissection rule, comparing marks as a whole), Amritdhara Pharmacy vs Satya Deo (phonetic similarity test), Corn Products vs Shangrila (overall impression test), Nandhini Deluxe vs Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation (coexistence of similar marks in different contexts), and S.M. Dyechem vs Cadbury India (acquired distinctiveness). Select cases that are directly relevant to the grounds of objection in your case.
Can I request a hearing to present my case?
Yes, you can request a hearing along with your written reply. In many cases, the Examiner schedules a hearing automatically if they are not fully satisfied with the written reply. At the hearing, you (or your trademark agent or attorney) can present oral arguments supplementing the written reply, address specific concerns of the Examiner directly, present additional evidence that was not included in the written reply, and respond to follow-up questions from the Examiner. Hearings can be conducted in person at the Trade Marks Registry (Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai, or Ahmedabad) or through virtual hearing via video conferencing. Virtual hearings have become common since 2020 and are available for most cases.
What happens after the hearing?
After the hearing, the Examiner issues a written order which can have one of three outcomes: Application accepted for advertisement: The objections are overcome, and the trademark will be published in the Trade Marks Journal for a 4-month opposition period. Application accepted with conditions: The application is accepted subject to certain conditions, such as a disclaimer on descriptive parts of the mark, limitation of the specification of goods or services, or acceptance as a series mark. Application refused: The Examiner is not satisfied and refuses the application with detailed reasons. If refused, you can file an appeal to the High Court (or the appropriate appellate authority) within 3 months of the refusal order. The appeal involves a fresh hearing before the court where new arguments and evidence can be presented.
What is a Letter of Consent and how can it help?
A Letter of Consent (LOC) is a written consent from the owner of a cited prior trademark stating that they have no objection to the registration of the applicant's mark. The LOC can be a powerful tool for overcoming Section 11 objections based on similarity to a prior mark. While the Trade Marks Registry is not bound to accept a Letter of Consent, in practice, it carries significant weight because it shows that the most affected party (the prior mark owner) does not believe there will be confusion. A variation of the LOC is a Coexistence Agreement, which is a formal agreement between both trademark owners allowing their marks to coexist in the market. The agreement may include conditions such as limiting use to specific goods, geographic areas, or trade channels.
Can I amend my trademark application to overcome objections?
Yes, in some cases, amending the application can help overcome objections. Possible amendments include: Adding a disclaimer for descriptive elements of the mark (for example, disclaiming the word 'Solutions' in a composite mark). Limiting the specification of goods or services to exclude items that overlap with the cited prior mark's coverage. Converting from a word mark to a device mark or vice versa, though this is rarely permitted after filing. Amending the class if the goods or services were filed in the wrong class. Note that amendments cannot expand the scope of the original application. The amendment must be filed using Form TM-16 (Application for Amendment of Application for Registration of Trademark). In some cases, the Examiner may suggest specific amendments during the hearing.
What is the Show Cause Hearing?
A Show Cause Hearing is a formal hearing scheduled by the Trade Marks Registry when the Examiner issues a Show Cause Notice to the applicant. The notice asks the applicant to show cause (provide reasons) why the trademark application should not be refused. A Show Cause Hearing is typically scheduled when the Examiner has reviewed the written reply but is not fully satisfied with the arguments or evidence. The hearing gives the applicant an opportunity to present their case orally, address the Examiner's specific concerns, and submit additional evidence. The applicant (or their agent or attorney) attends the hearing and makes oral submissions. The hearing typically lasts 15 to 30 minutes per application.
What if the cited prior mark is not in use?
If the cited prior mark is not in use, you can use this as a strong argument in your reply. Under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, a registered trademark can be cancelled if it has not been used for a continuous period of 5 years or more. You can: argue in your reply that the cited mark appears to be a dead or dormant mark that should not block your registration. File a cancellation petition under Section 47 against the cited mark for non-use while your application is pending. Request the Examiner to allow your application on the condition that you file a cancellation petition against the cited mark. Market evidence showing no presence of the cited mark in the marketplace strengthens this argument.
Can I file for trademark objection reply without a lawyer?
Yes, you can file the reply without a lawyer or trademark agent. There is no legal requirement that the reply must be drafted or filed by a professional. However, it is strongly recommended to engage a qualified trademark agent or attorney because: drafting a persuasive legal reply requires knowledge of trademark law, case law, and examination practices. Identifying the correct arguments for each type of objection requires experience. Presenting before the Examiner at a hearing requires familiarity with Tribunal procedures. An experienced agent has a better understanding of what arguments are likely to succeed based on past practice. The stakes are high because failure to overcome the objection means the application is refused, and you may need to start over.
How long does the entire objection response process take?
The timeline for the objection response process depends on several factors: the written reply must be filed within 30 days (or within the extension period). After filing the reply, the Examiner reviews it, which can take 2 to 6 months. If a hearing is scheduled, the hearing date is typically 1 to 3 months after the reply is reviewed. After the hearing, the Examiner's order is issued within 1 to 2 months. In total, the process from receiving the objection to final resolution typically takes 4 to 12 months. If the application is accepted after the reply or hearing, it proceeds to publication in the Trade Marks Journal. If refused, the appeal process to the High Court can take another 1 to 3 years depending on the court's schedule.
What is a conditional acceptance of a trademark?
A conditional acceptance means the Examiner accepts the trademark application for advertisement (publication in the Trade Marks Journal) subject to certain conditions. Common conditions include: a disclaimer on descriptive or non-distinctive parts of the mark, meaning the applicant does not claim exclusive rights to those specific elements. Limitation of goods or services in the specification to narrow the scope and avoid conflict with prior marks. Acceptance as a series trademark if multiple variations are involved. Acceptance subject to the outcome of a cancellation petition filed against a cited prior mark. While conditional acceptance is not ideal, it is much better than outright refusal, and in most cases, the conditions are reasonable and acceptable.
What is the difference between trademark objection and trademark opposition?
A trademark objection is raised by the Trade Marks Examiner (a government official) during the examination of the trademark application, before the mark is published. It is based on the Examiner's review of the application against the provisions of the Trade Marks Act. A trademark opposition is filed by a third party (any person or entity) after the trademark has been accepted and published in the Trade Marks Journal. The opposition period is 4 months from the date of publication. Opposition involves a formal proceeding with counter-statements, evidence, and hearings between the applicant and the opponent. Objection is a preliminary hurdle, while opposition is a contested proceeding between two parties.
Can the Examiner raise new objections after the reply is filed?
Yes, in some cases, the Examiner may raise new or additional objections after reviewing the reply or during the hearing. This can happen when: the Examiner discovers a new prior mark that was not cited in the original Examination Report. The reply reveals new issues (for example, claiming use in a class different from what was applied for). The Examiner identifies additional absolute grounds for refusal based on a closer examination. In such cases, the applicant is given an opportunity to address the new objections through an additional written reply or at the hearing. While this can extend the process, it is not common and typically occurs in complex cases.
What if my trademark application is refused after the hearing?
If your trademark application is refused after the hearing, you have the following options: File an appeal to the High Court (after the abolition of IPAB, appeals from the Trade Marks Registry go to the High Court of the state where the concerned Registry office is located). The appeal must be filed within 3 months of the refusal order. In the appeal, you can present fresh arguments, new evidence, and additional case law. The High Court will examine the Examiner's order and may overturn it if it finds the refusal unreasonable. Alternatively, you can file a fresh application with modifications (different mark, different class, or different specification) addressing the grounds of refusal. In some cases, filing a new application with a modified mark may be faster and more cost-effective than a lengthy court appeal.
What is the examination report response filing fee?
There is no separate government fee for filing a response to the Examination Report. The response is filed as part of the original application process for which the initial filing fee (4,500 rupees per class for e-filing) has already been paid. However, if you are filing the response through a trademark agent or attorney, they will charge their professional fees for drafting the reply, which typically range from 3,000 to 15,000 rupees depending on the complexity of the objections and the reputation of the agent. If a hearing is scheduled, additional professional fees for hearing attendance may apply. If you need to file an amendment form (TM-16), a separate fee of 900 rupees per class (e-filing) is applicable.
How do I check the status of my trademark objection reply?
You can check the status of your objection reply and the overall application status on the IP India portal. Go to ipindiaservices.gov.in and use the National/IRDI Number Search or Application Number Search. Enter your trademark application number and view the current status. Common status updates include: Objected (Examination Report issued, awaiting reply), Reply Filed/Hearing (reply has been filed and is under review or hearing scheduled), Accepted and Advertised (objection overcome, published in Trade Marks Journal), Refused (application refused after examination), and Show Cause Hearing (hearing scheduled). Check the status regularly after filing your reply to stay informed about any developments or hearing dates.
What are analogous registrations and how do they help?
Analogous registrations are trademarks that are similar to your mark and have been successfully registered by the Trade Marks Registry for similar goods or services. Citing analogous registrations in your reply shows the Examiner that the Registry has previously accepted marks that are comparable to yours, establishing a precedent of acceptance. For example, if your mark TECHPRO is objected to as descriptive for technology services, but marks like TECHSMART, TECHGURU, or TECHPLUS have been registered for similar services, citing these as analogous registrations weakens the descriptiveness objection. Search the IP India database to find relevant analogous registrations. While the Examiner is not bound by prior decisions, consistency in treatment is a persuasive argument.
Can I withdraw a trademark application after receiving an objection?
Yes, you can voluntarily withdraw (abandon) your trademark application at any stage by filing Form TM-64 (Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Registration of a Mark). This might be appropriate if: the objections are very strong and unlikely to be overcome, you have decided to rebrand or use a different mark, the cited prior mark clearly conflicts with your application and no reasonable argument can be made, or you want to file a fresh application with a modified mark. Withdrawing the application does not entitle you to a refund of the application fee. After withdrawal, you can file a new application if you wish, but it will have a new filing date and priority.
What is the role of the Trade Marks Journal in the objection process?
The Trade Marks Journal plays an important role in the trademark registration process, though its primary relevance is after the objection stage. Once a trademark application overcomes all objections, it is accepted and advertised (published) in the Trade Marks Journal. The publication period is 4 months during which any third party can file an opposition. During the objection reply process, the Trade Marks Journal is useful for researching cited prior marks (their publication details, opposition history) and for finding analogous registrations that support your arguments. The Journal is published online on the IP India portal and can be searched by application number, mark name, or class.
How does the anti-dissection rule apply to trademark objections?
The anti-dissection rule is a fundamental principle in trademark law that requires marks to be compared as a whole, not by dissecting them into individual parts. This rule, established in the landmark case Cadila Healthcare Ltd vs Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd (2001), is extremely useful when responding to Section 11 objections. If the Examiner has objected based on similarity of a part or element of your mark with a prior mark, you can argue that the marks must be compared in their entirety including all visual, phonetic, and conceptual elements. When compared as composite wholes, marks that share common elements may still have a sufficiently different overall commercial impression to coexist without confusion.
What is the Doctrine of Prior Use and how does it help?
The Doctrine of Prior Use establishes that prior use of a trademark gives superior rights over mere registration. If you have been using your trademark before the cited prior mark was applied for or registered, you can argue under Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act that your prior use entitles you to continued use and registration. To invoke this doctrine, provide: documentary evidence of first use (earliest invoices, advertisements, incorporation certificate using the mark), continuous use evidence spanning from the first use date to the present, evidence that your use predates the cited mark's application or use date. If successful, this argument can override a Section 11 objection entirely.
What are common mistakes to avoid in the objection reply?
Common mistakes that weaken or undermine objection replies include: filing a generic or template reply that does not specifically address the exact grounds cited in the Examination Report. Failing to provide evidence of use when claiming distinctiveness through use. Not comparing the marks properly and ignoring obvious similarities while overemphasizing minor differences. Missing the filing deadline and letting the application become abandoned. Not citing relevant case law to support legal arguments. Providing weak or irrelevant evidence such as undated documents, internal records without third-party validation, or evidence from after the filing date when claiming prior use. Being argumentative or defensive in tone rather than presenting a reasoned, professional, and evidence-based response.
Can I file multiple trademark applications for the same mark if one is objected?
Yes, you can file a new trademark application for the same mark even while the original application with an objection is pending. This can be a strategic move if: you want to file in a different class where the objection grounds may not apply. You want to file a modified version of the mark (different font, design, or additional elements) that may be more distinctive. You want to file a composite mark (word plus device) instead of a plain word mark to overcome distinctiveness objections. However, filing a new application does not guarantee acceptance, and if the grounds of objection apply equally to the new application, it will also face the same objections. The new application will have a new filing date and priority.
What is the role of evidence of acquired distinctiveness?
Acquired distinctiveness (also called secondary meaning) is the process by which a mark that may initially be descriptive or non-distinctive becomes distinctive through extensive and continuous use in the market. This is one of the most powerful arguments against Section 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(b) objections. The proviso to Section 9 specifically states that a mark shall not be refused if before the date of application it has acquired a distinctive character as a result of the use made of it. Evidence includes: years of continuous use, substantial sales turnover and advertising expenditure, geographic extent of use, consumer recognition surveys, media coverage and awards, domain registrations and social media followers, and third-party references to the mark as identifying the applicant's goods.
How important is the trademark agent or attorney in overcoming objections?
A skilled trademark agent or attorney is extremely important in the objection response process because: they can accurately interpret the Examination Report and identify the best legal strategy. They have experience drafting replies that address the Examiner's specific concerns. They know which case law is relevant and how to cite it effectively. They understand the Examiner's perspective and can anticipate follow-up questions. They can attend hearings and present oral arguments persuasively. They can advise on strategic decisions such as whether to amend, consent, or appeal. Statistics suggest that professionally represented applications have a significantly higher success rate in overcoming objections compared to self-represented ones. The investment in professional fees is typically far less than the cost of re-filing.
What happens after my trademark objection is successfully overcome?
After your objection is successfully overcome, the trademark application is accepted and advertised (published) in the Trade Marks Journal. The publication marks the beginning of a 4-month opposition period during which any person can file an opposition to the registration. If no opposition is filed within 4 months, the application proceeds to registration and a Registration Certificate is issued. If an opposition is filed, a separate opposition proceeding begins with counter-statements, evidence rounds, and hearings between the applicant and the opponent. The entire process from overcoming objection to receiving the registration certificate (assuming no opposition) typically takes 4 to 8 months. Once registered, the trademark is protected for 10 years and can be renewed indefinitely.
Need Help With This Process?
Our experts are ready to assist you every step of the way. Get started with a free consultation today!
